How doing HRIA has changed how I look at SIA
How I became an 'expert' in HR - sociologist/SIA practitioner, 15 years experience in mining assessment, steep learning curve,...Don't have a methodologically rigorous approach to HRIA (an important gap)
How do you define whether a company is respecting HR.
Used IFC Standards (that company had committed to, to measure respect and due diligence)
Used DIHR's HR Compliance Assessment Toolkit
Changed from HRIA to a Human Rights Assessment - because of inclusivity/baseline
Classification of findings:
- Violation
- Infringement
- Failure of respect
- ...
- Enhancement
- Consultation
- Environment
- Labour
- Security
- Land acquisition
- Economic and social investment
- Access to remedy (Respect of HR in judicial system)
- Cross cutting issues - conflict, indigenous (collective) rights, gender, weakness of state protection of HR
Found on the web www.oncommonground.ca
3 differences between HRIA and SIA
- Importance of understanding country context in HRIA
- Scope of responsibility - often clients don't want to take responsibility for indirect social impacts, scope under HR is broader
- Rights based approach - requires participation and integration of rights holders
Challenges
- Attribution
- Authority - community vs expert evidence/experiences
- ...
Final Thoughts
- Looks beyond compensatory practices - social investments don't make up for negative impacts
- Like SIA multiple stages and levels
- Legitimate scope of the review beyond SIA regulations
- due diligence
- Shifts of the paradigm
- Realpolitik
- Cumulative effects
No comments:
Post a Comment